Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Review: Shogun, by James Clavell



James Clavell
1975


An Alexandrine Couplet About Shogun
A Dutch sailor is shipwrecked in Feudal Japan
He hob-nobs there for years—and learns that Europe sucks


This review could start and end with this: 


Wow, this book is pretty offensive.


But since I don’t say anything in 6 words I could say in 600, I’ll go into detail.

I suppose it wouldn’t be quite so offensive it was written A) By a Japanese person, B) By a historian, or C) By a Japanese historian. Sadly, it’s written by none of these, but rather by James Clavell.


James Clavell is probably not entitled to write 
“A Novel of Japan”


Shogun is so over the top you need to play an mp3 of stereotype wind instruments and wave a Rising Sun flag before reading about the plot. It’s a rule.



 This’ll do.


You've pressed Play? Then I'll continue: A Dutch sailor crash lands in Japan, where only the Spanish and Portuguese have been. The Dutch don’t know anything about Japan, the Japanese don’t know anything about non-Catholic Europe, and the Spanish mostly want the Dutch guy dead or gone. He spends the rest of the novel being used as a pawn between political powers throughout Japan, becoming a samurai, and realizing that Europe sucks and he’d much rather get massages, bang geishas, and wave his sword around than return to his wife in Holland.

Because you can always trust the back cover of a novel, you know that this is all “MARVELOUSLY ENGROSSING” AND “IRRESISTIBLE” (their caps, not mine), that it “grips the reader”, and that it isn’t only "something you read—you live it.”

Despite its insistence to the contrary, Shogun is basically Clavell’s masturbatory fantasy about Feudal Japan. Though it assures us it’s an inspiring epic about humanity (or something) it mostly inspired countless vaguely offensive stories of Westerners hanging out in whatever year they believe Feudal Japan took place.

 
Who remembers Heroes? Anyone? Does anyone remember Heroes?
 
I mean yeah, the book is based on a true story and many of the interesting cultural details are likely accurate. But this novel was, despite Clavell’s insistence, never about history or culture. It’s Japanophile/history slash fic, replete with hari-kari, bathing and massage scenes, archery and sword waving, geishas, sake, a tea ceremony that goes on for pages and pages, and the wholesale subjugation of the lesser classes. If you open it to any random page you’ll find dime store writing masked by one of two things: how awesome Feudal Japan was, or political intrigue. And I’m going to prove it:

 Here’re 2 quotes from a page I randomly opened to right now:



. . . Each tiny house was set on elegant pilings with circling verandas and four steps up, made from the finest woods, everything polished and gleaming. Each was separate, fifty paces from its neighbors and surrounded by manicured gardens within the greater garden within the high bamboo wall. There were streamlets, and lily ponds and waterfalls and blossom trees in abundance with day perfumes and night perfumes, sweet smelling and luxurious. Clean stone footpaths, delicately roofed, led to the central baths, cold and hot and very hot, fed by natural springs. Multicolored lanterns and happy servants and maids and never a cross word to disturb the tree bells and bubbling water and singing birds in their aviaries  . . .



. . . “Ah, how kind you are to me, Anjin-san. First bathe, then the evening food and lots of sake.”
“Good. Very good.”



These 2 passages are from a page I actually selected randomly just now. If you’re not such a fan of florid and heavy handed descriptions and monosyllabic dialogue then you don’t like Ayn Rand then you wish I would’ve opened to the next page. On the very next page . . . and this is true . . .  the female lead pulls out “an assortment of pillow devices” (read: sex toys) and the couple pick a cock ring to use that night. They spend most of a page putting it on, and after they “pillow” she goes to sleep “instantly, totally spent” and the guy thinks “I know I’ve truly satisfied her. For once I’m absolutely sure.” Never mind that they’re both married, since she doesn’t love her husband and his wife is in Holland, so it doesn’t count, right? Isn’t there some rule about different zip codes or sailors having one in every port? Those are rules, right? Right James Clavell? Right?

Believe me, it’s not even a spoiler to tell you that the sailor’s wife never sees him again.

 
What A Dick.
 

In case I got off track, remember I am not making any of these scenes up, and again, random page!

Oh, did I mention this book is 1211 pages long? That puts it in the top 50 longest books ever published.



That deserves fireworks.

Really, the only reason Shogun was noticed, read, and became popular is because it’s easy to write political intrigue and discuss cultural details if you have the fortitude to write 1200 pages. Clavell did it on a typewriter, and that is impressive, but it doesn’t make it high quality.

Despite everything, it’s not uninteresting if you can speed read, happen to commute four hours a day by bus, and have the wherewithal to distinguish truth from fiction. It created or reinforced many of the West’s pre-conceived notions about classical Japan, so that might be interesting to international studies majors. I don’t know. The book’s heavy enough you could chain it to a prisoner’s leg to keep them from escaping and, as discussed, is often offensive, so I can’t honestly recommend it unless you have a specific interest. It’s much faster to just watch the 1980 miniseries version, which does a great job covering what’s in the book. Mostly because it's really fucking long.


9 hours, 7 minutes long.
Really.




 

Save the fireworks for after you finish it. You’ll deserve them.


Okay, full disclosure: I actually really like the movie. It’s ridiculous and spectacular and I’ve convinced several people to watch it. All but one of them was mad at me, but that’s neither here nor there.
                               
If you’re pressed for time you can just watch the Tom Cruise version.


 
 . . . because it’s pretty much the same movie.




1 comment: